Shooting blanks on the Main
Review: THE SHOOTING GALLERY
By Robyn Sassen
Cue guest writer
Fake blood, coins up the arse, washing-up liquid as a lubricant to the backdrop of all kinds of images of gratuitous violence from contemporary media…come on! Aryan Kaganof and Catherine Henegan’s The Shooting Gallery is in danger of being a dull has-been rather than the shockingly outrageous postmodern gesture it bills itself as.
Performance art slipped onto the scene at the time of the two World Wars. The world had become an ugly, hostile place and artists wanted to challenge society. They moved away from traditional approaches to art and began to use their own bodies to create work. So nudity, bodily acts and even blood-letting became a means for artists to radically engage their audience, challenging them (and, by default, broader society) to rethink how they related to the world.
The Shooting Gallery is a collaborative effort between Henegan and Kaganof, and represents Henegan’s debut as a director, and an attempt at melding values between performed and art-based gesture.
But while it is all very well to issue a press release saying the piece is based on the Bang Bang Club and the type of photography they did during the politically turbulent 1990s, and all very well to title the piece with a pun on heroin- and photographer- culture, it is another thing to show convincing evidence of this in the work.
Poorly strung together, the work does not speak convincingly for itself. Watching it, I kept thinking of other local artists in this discipline: Steven Cohen, Tracey Rose, Berni Searle, Churchill Madikida all use their bodies and autobiographical presences in a meticulously thought manner. Their work challenges taboo, but it is the unexpected sense of the poetic in it that makes it art.
Coming away from Shooting Gallery, I was left cold. I was not traumatised nor discomforted by the piece. Rather, I was bored.
Its humour is trite, the sequence of image and gesture not well pinned together. A ham-handed attempt to bludgeon stereotypes with more stereotypes, the piece is an attempted assault on the physical senses of the audience, which fails. It exploits media imagery and even offers a silly, self-deprecating insight into how the press might receive it.
That said, two inspired sequences are not destroyed by the dearth of critical shaping: a moment when Kaganof plays a vuvuzela in tandem with the movements of a vulture projectedc on-screen; another where a naked Kaganof is suspended upside down by a chain from the ceiling. He assumes the position of an inverted crucifix, and as his body is lowered, he scatters silver coins across the stage.
The Shooting Gallery is a sponsored event on the main programme. it opened yesterday to enthusiastic audience attendance. that’s good. Festivalgoers need exposure to this kind of material, if only to stretch their horizons.
July 21st, 2006 at 9:50 am
hi robyn
i hope you are well.
germaine moolman was kind enough to inform me that you have submitted the review you wrote for cue newspaper to contempo for re-publication.
beyond the dubious ethics of being paid twice for one review which is not up for discussion here, i would like to invite you to attend the press premiere of the shooting gallery at the market theatre on friday 14 july at 20:15.
i think it would be fair on the performance and more rigorous of you as a critic to review the market theatre show for contempo.
i am not asking you to like the shooting gallery, but i am asking you to earn your money fairly and not simply cash in on the review you have already had published once.
there will be two tickets for you at the box office on friday.
best wishes
aryan kaganof
July 21st, 2006 at 9:51 am
Dear Aryan,
Thank you for your email. I’m sorry you did not email it to my correct email address initially–Germaine Moolman was kind enough to advise me of it, and to forward it to me. Aryan, be very careful of making assumptions about the ethics of others. It can compromise any integrity you may have. Before you go about accusing people of anything, check your facts. Cue did not pay me to write that review, Contempo commissioned me to do so, and Cue got their permission to run it. It was a proofreading oversight that Contempo’s name did not appear in my byline. You are welcome to contact Darryl Accone, one of the co-editors of Cue if you do not believe me. I am not available to attend your press opening at the Market Theatre.
regards,
ROBYN SASSEN
July 21st, 2006 at 2:43 pm
Criticism is a study by which men grow important and formidable at very small expense. He whom nature has made weak, and idleness keeps ignorant, may yet support his vanity by the name of a critic.
- Samuel Johnson
July 21st, 2006 at 2:57 pm
[…] Robyn Sassen’s review, published in the National Arts Festival newspaper Cue, which slated The Shooting Gallery with its nudity and fake blood gets a lot of attention. […]