kagablog

December 14, 2007

For Nots

Filed under: paradoxism, aphorisibles — ABRAXAS @ 4:29 pm

*

We know what the Not is not.
But can we know what the Not is?

*

Whatever is is not Not.
Does this mean that the Not isn’t, ie. is not?

*

Is what is never Not?
And if so that Not is what is then we go back to
dot!

*

When I say the Not is or the Not is not this is in fact the same thing.
That is, whatever is is also Not (when what is is not!).

*

One Response to “For Nots”

  1. pow-wow Says:

    sure
    but try being not
    it feels different
    yes, not being is very much being
    not to be sneezed at
    but being not is not being as fully as what being being is being
    however many gymnastics you perform in an attempt to make sense
    the negative space is still empty
    it only makes ab-sense
    and the side of janus’ face in shadow
    sure sucks a lot of
    forget me not
    twinsavers

    HATCHOO!

Leave a Reply