a letter from mick raubenheimer regarding peter machen
nat mos en ander amper-tautologies.
Sarah and Helge, relaxish! Mister Machen’s views are his own, and in several moments spot-on. While his ‘pre-emptive’ isn’t quite that, the general aura of hesitance and contra-qualifiers are.. mefinds it innersting that many Kaga-critics are hesitant in going full-throttle with their negative assessments - they sense, perhaps, that there’s more going on than they’re privy to (conceptually or otherwise).
It be very much so that Aryan’s art playfully negotiates so-called art’s categories.. and while he proclaims his media-specifity, the central blur of his artistic self is play.. and the generally intrusive persona of his authorial is knowingly loud and look-at-me’eish.
All credit to Mr Machen (and he may) for a central apprehension (mind’s the pun): Aryan’s art, its centre, all-blurry mistique inside (what? has Kaganof cracked the Dasein code??), is his soul. In Kagian economy then: his ego.
Much of Kaganof’s output Does seem, what was it, conceptually lightweight? And much of it is..
but the (shifting, necromancial) point be: Kaganof’s output perpetua-wields ulterior profundity. There are too many sides, too many gestures and moments, for even the healthiest critic to definitively pin down (and he knows this. Ah yes, Another one-anna-quart minute film about some lass’s ass, or some Ass’s lass, or sum helix’s swirl edited to the beat of pre- and/or post-pornographic sound.. There always are those EVENTS - where he/it unleashes violent genius (and delivers it suavely [in Kaga-speak: casually]. And the Kaga-structuring knows this. Which is why he/it exists in brackets..)
The ‘kananof’ protest, Sarah, is mute; misreading the ‘SA gothic’, Helge, is unnecessary. And the swelling of my comment, which aimed at a polite two-sentence space, is telling.
Kaga does not care about the blander shades of shit.
Conceivably, Aryan cares about the brighter shats of shit y’ken? Having intra-transcended artistic worries, his genetic code breathes an occult truth:
self as art.
[there’re many more acute fings me would’ve sed: Aryan, above else, being a fascination of soul/I/ego/organicism, but me’s aware now that my initial design of: “chill Helge and Hills..” has reconinterswollshqueened into some accent of mistra Mache (”Jy mag mar”)implication of some emotional, ‘Heated’-like cult of, like, three or, like, firteen fans]
Imaginary interview, circa Eternity:
unknowable interviewer: “So, but like [mind all puns], what was it like?”
AK: “It was very much up and down”
UI: “Any regrets? And butt what I want to know is actually - what was best?”
AK: “No. Be specific.”
UI: ” Uhrm. Was ‘up’ best, or ‘down’”?
AK: “It depends where you’re asking from. It’s actually ‘inside’ and ‘outside’.. and you wouldn’t know.”
UI: “Erm.”
AK: “Yes”
September 26th, 2008 at 11:45 am
good grief aryan!!
it is exactly this dumb focused excuse that ‘machen’s veiws are his own” that the extablishment (raubenheimer) uses to excuse what amounts to a diatribe of oneupmanship based on assumption (not even fact). if mr. machen’s views are “just his own” then why the fuck is he shrouding it in the context of ‘critic’ and publishing it on artthrob which presumes to cover art? perhaps this is one of those times when machen should have kept his views to himself, for they serve no usefull purpose other than to take the standards of journalism to a new low. raubenheimer does not elaborate on which point made by machen is valid? i cannot see a single one!!
it also appearts that mick raubenheimer cannot comprehend kaganof!! but he at least is not setting himself up as the ‘authority’ and therefore telling everyone that as far as kaganof goes, anything goes.
i am not a naughty child that needs to have his knuckles rapped either, not least of all by mick raubenheimer!
September 26th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
a rampant one from the harlequinned one!
don’t know mick so don’t know whether he’s part of said establishment…
prefer his word stylee to that of peter though, and kind of get some of his gets (:
September 27th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
his gets
does what machen
does not..
whose own peevish limp pointing
points to one thing
a kind of amalgamated frustration
with selves..
a boring one at that.
September 28th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
mick
please forgive that last paragraph….too emotional from me…..and just not necessary….
September 29th, 2008 at 11:06 am
Ta Helge’
I’s no rapper. But it was the establishment bit that really frowned me.
ciao
Miaout