kagablog

December 19, 2008

cecilia on conflicted sexuality

Filed under: cecilia, sex — ABRAXAS @ 1:43 pm

I found the comment on Anton’s porn piece extremely interesting. “No more reality for me please” writes with beautiful honesty.

Sex without nudity is the most interesting concept.

No vulnerability, no exposure. Can sex exist without it? I don’t think porn can. Porn is like a rehearsed advert reminding us where the blood can run to. Suits (birthday suits) are usually needed to come across to the viewer.

If there is no revelation of the body parts being associated with becoming aroused, would sex be as pleasurable? Even if you are born blind, there must be ways for your brain to “visualize” sexual organs, breasts, facial expression during orgasm etc. If you are born deaf, would you be able to imagine what a lover’s breath and voice sound like during the act? Sex is an act performed with every single sense. Even inhibited sex puts one in a defenceless place. Inhibition, not being able to cross the boundaries of your own hang-ups, is the most obvious form of nudity. White suits covering your whole body except for the areas that matter might just arouse your partner more. Imagination is visualization with extra strong glasses on. And no matter how you cover yourself up, when the orgasm happens you die. Is there a more pure form of exposure? Can one be more naked than during an orgasm, with clothes on or not?

Drugs during sex usually clothe you wonderfully. Your lack of inhibition on drugs is a fantastic cover up.

I think being in conflict with one’s own sexuality is extremely sexy. And brave.

Wishing your most primal attribute would just cease to exist?

That is some serious conflict, since instinct is the most powerful manipulator.

Brain vs body? It’s the same thing.

13 Responses to “cecilia on conflicted sexuality”

  1. mick Says:

    ag tos man ekt nounet iets beaut geseg en die blof spuugituit!!!!!!!!

  2. mick Says:

    Dear Joel and/or AK - if’s me original comment is retrievable from the gook-glowing wastescape of rejected spamlikes… please repost it. Was sent just prior reactive explosion posted (? why that was posted me knows not) above.

  3. anton Says:

    mik mok man, yr flippen odd guy…but i like yr jabberwocky text style…keep on in it and soon we’ll all be talkin it…

    i just wrote a different response to the response to which cecilia is responding, so won’t repeat it here..but i find your attraction to conflicted sexuality interesting…i’m not sure i’d necessarily agree though…people being confident and taking possession of their sexuality seems more sexy to me…if they’re conflicted then it feels as though they want me to decide for them and i don’t like doing that, being pacifistically inclined etc and always wary of exercising an influence…or maybe just being a wuss etc…

    i think one thing pornography does is make sexual relations appear to be transparant and easy..it’s erica jong’s perfect zipless fuck, which feels like it moves beyond the actual imperfect aging body, the body that needs…none of those bodies have any needs, like sleep or food or tenderness, they are all whole and self contained…and in this way like automatons mostly…

  4. mick Says:

    ant won on (gratuitious ship arriving too reference)
    I believe myself gifted in ink (which means gifted in foot-to-mouth and out) buts really the aboves were un-intendo. Me’s been assaulted in the pornographic of meaning/she-ning/he-ning all eve (yes me’m biased).. tmorrow’s me’ll lickspond to your open-ended tation on the ol Pornograph. Fascinating blandwheel he be..
    Miaout. With intent.

  5. femi leadbelly Says:

    hmm.. the body lacks
    and needs tenderness,
    deaf dumb or blind
    the residue
    of the beauty
    of the inner self
    stripped bare before a lover..
    i repeat.. a lov-er..him or her.
    i am clumsy.. and withdrawn
    about my own sexuality
    i see it not as sexy but as
    traumatic.
    thanks for trying..though.

  6. cecilia Says:

    traumatic?

  7. cecilia Says:

    or normal?

  8. femi leadbelly Says:

    what we bring
    in our naked bodies
    is our raw fear
    normal or
    traumatic..
    brought on by experience..
    or the lack of..

  9. Anonymoys Says:

    fucking is fucking

  10. cecilia Says:

    anonymoys
    i think you just hit the nail on the head

  11. mick Says:

    atypical swellulae of negative space in last response. Dearidda

  12. femi leadbelly Says:

    then write about fucking as a
    fucking act of fucking
    not a long intellectual
    disemboweling of guilt
    and conflict
    and hey aint
    that wat personal
    porn is
    fucking..

  13. cecilia Says:

    take a chill pill femi
    it’s the season to be merry

Leave a Reply